Saturday, October 29, 2011

Open Prompt: October 29th


1975 Also. Unlike the novelist, the writer of a play does not use his own voice and only rarely uses a narrator's voice to guide the audience's responses to character and action. Select a play you have read and write an essay in which you explain the techniques the playwright uses to guide his audience's responses to the central characters and the action. You might consider the effect on the audience of things like setting, the use of comparable and contrasting characters, and the characters' responses to each other. Support your argument with specific references to the play. Do not give a plot summary.

The playwright Hamlet focuses on the central conflict between the protagonist Hamlet and his desire to kill his uncle, King Cladius, for betraying his father to claim the thrown. To show the audience the struggles that Hamlet faces, this play uses techniques such as blank verse, soliloquies, and foils to guide the audiences responses to characters and actions of the play. 

The playwright uses blank verse to add emphasis on the emotions of the characters. This technique gives the audience a sense of what the character is feeling as he speaks and how strongly he or she may feel about what is going in the play. For example, lines 33-68 in Act 4 scene 4 form a blank verse as a part of a monologue spoken by Hamlet that adds emphasis on how he is feeling. He compares the bravery of the soldiers to that of his conscience of killing King Cladius. Hamlet is trying to help himself understand that bravery is found behind the principal of one's action, and not in the manner in which it is performed. Thus, the audience is able to interpret that Hamlet is not killing out of honor, but rather out of the love that he has for his father. 

The soliloquies Hamlet gives during briefs moments of the play gives insight to the audience about what Hamlet's motives are, and how the audience can relate to the complexity of emotions he feels. For example, when Hamlet states "Oh what a rogue Peasant Slave Am I" ( Act 2 Scene 2) ,he discusses how nervous he is to kill King Cladius yet how badly his desire is growing to kill him. Thus, the audience understands Hamlet's selfishness and anger. 

The character Fortinbras foils Hamlet to allow the audience to understand why Hamlet acts the way he does. Fortinbras has many similarities to Hamlet such as he is also a son of a deceased king whose uncle has taken over the thrown and he also seeks avenge death of his father. However, Hamlet seeks revenge on his uncle, King Cladius, purely out of hatred as Fortinbras seeks avenge out of honor and dignity for his country of Norway. These two contrasting motives to kill are shown in action when king Cladius is praying and Hamlet does not kill him because he believes the act of personal vengeance will send King Cladius to heaven as Fortinbras is not considering these morals when he kills his uncle. Thus, showing the audience that Hamlet has morals and a strong faith in his religion. 

This playwright uses these techniques to show the complexity that the Hamlet feels before killing his uncle, King Cladius, and how the audience is to respond to these actions of the play. 


4 comments:

  1. Ok what went well:
    I think that you have some good details and the examples are pretty good.

    What didn't go as well
    Make sure to answer the question, IT asks you to anaylize setting, contrasting charecters and charecters reactions to each other. You addresed contrasting charecters but you completly skiped over the other two.
    Also I think you need to go a bit deeper.
    Your thesis is essentialy a restatment of the question.It does not actually answer the question.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe it told me to consider, it did not clearly state " use setting and character's responses to each other to support your argument". And my thesis asks what techniques the playwright uses, so I stated what techniques I am going to use and address each body paragraph about.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really liked how your body paragraphs were really specific and clear. Even though I have not read/watched Hamlet before, I understood what you were explaining. However, I would provide more detail about the audience responses. It would also help to explicitly state what technique you are using to support your ideas, as well as more cited quotes or paraphrased sections from the play. I also agree with what the other Claire said about "going deeper". This can be done by examining meaning of the piece.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If i could add a sound effect, i would add an applause to this.

    Its very nice in the way that it flows, you transition well from paragraph to paragraph. However, i doubt that you actually know the lines at which a blank verse starts or stops while you're writing the real AP open prompt. I would also move away from simply summarizing what is happening during the play to actually talking about the signigance of the techiniques of Shakespear.

    Your writing doesn't have any fatal flaws, there could be more detail and analysis going into it but thats it. Very well done, especially on the conventions and fluency of the piece.

    ReplyDelete